DONATE facebook-icon-copy twitterICON

Grassroots 100% passionate volunteers

Fighting to Save our NHS from profiteers

999logofinal_Pill_straight_360 999 Blog

By 999 Call for the NHS, Sep 6 2017 05:12PM

Thanks to Deborah Harrington

999 Call for the NHS member and founder of Public Matters

It's true. I'm sick of Wellness.

I am sick of smiling NHS executives, Clinical Commissioning Group leaders, Think Tank Thought Leaders blathering on - as they always do once they've found a nice catchy soundbite - about the NHS being redesigned as a wellness service, not a sickness service.

This is a phrase I am sick of hearing. It's tosh! Utter daft contemptuous tosh!!

It implies that the NHS was set up only to treat - and perhaps to treat unnecessarily - rather than to cure and keep people healthy. Uh...

It implies that doctors are investing in keeping us sick.


It completely ignores the fact that Bevan was minister for health and housing and in that post-war period considered that sound, secure and healthy housing would do more in the long run for the nation's overall health than anything else.

It ignores a comprehensive vaccination programme brought in to protect the nation's children from common diseases which could lead to death or long term health problems.

It ignores the investment of time and creativity of clinical staff in shortening the amount of time patients have to stay in hospital.

It ignores the contraceptive pill, ante-natal care, smoking cessation programmes, sexual health clinics and routine cervical smear tests.

It ignores the extraordinary development of prosthetics which enable those who would previously been forced to live with quite restrictive physical conditions to be limited instead only as far as their imaginations will allow them to go - as the existence of Prof Stephen Hawking so beautifully demonstrates.

In short it ignores all the real efforts (many in the process of being dismantled) that have been made to ensure health rather than illness is the norm for the majority of the population. But the primary purpose of the NHS is to look after our illnesses and disabilities. Because that is the core of healthcare and is exactly the part of healthcare that so many people could not afford to access before the creation of the NHS.

So I may start to scream next time I hear the 'it's a wellness not a sickness' meaningless drivel. It's a commonly used phrase by think tanks, NHS England flunkeys, etc to validate the changes they are making. Did I say changes? Drastic cuts and damaging harm disguised as 'improvement' and propped up with positive claptrap smoke and mirrors.

They all fall into the same sick bucket, sorry- "well vessel". Promoting individual responsibility for our health (assuming we can all afford the delivered organic box or the weekly supply of quinoa and spirulina) they calmy congratulat the NHS of old but then move quickly to:

"The world has changed. If it were now we wouldn't design the NHS like this. It was designed to treat illness, but what we need in our modern changing world is a wellness service that focuses on how people can keep themselves well. We now have the opportunity to change that."

It is Grade 'A' BS. More Smoke and Mirrors to mask the current and future denial of care in our new Not-the-NHS through the 5 Year Forward View STPs, Vanguards, Success Regimes and any number of bamboozling corporate disruptive devices.

It is a common claim of those that are cutting and selling off the NHS, that it's ok that they're doing it because we are going to have what is known as (another Americanisation) Health PROMOTION - wonderful behaviour change programmes that will empower people with long term illnesses like heart, respiratory, diabetes etc to change their lifestyles and take up their beds and walk. It will have to be their beds because they are not going to find one in a hospital anywhere near them.

They like to say it is Prevention.

But it isn't preventive health as we know it - which is mass public programmes like clean water, sewerage disposal, clean air (the chance would be a fine thing, vaccinations etc.) It is a very different beast because it is a neocon framing of the problem of ill health that conveniently blames those suffering from it for their own illness, cos they have the wrong behaviour and the wrong lifestyle.

Along the way, a number of well meaning people who see the sense in tackling the structural social and economic and environmental causes of ill health have got caught up in the absurd rhetoric about needing to change the NHS from an illness service to a wellness service.

So while housing and education and air quality control and clean water are essential to good health along with adequate food labelling and more they are not 'the NHS'. They are the responsibitiy of other government departments working in tandem with the NHS. Coordinated. Integrated. Not morphed into a one stop shop for society's needs.

If you are anywhere near me at that moment when some smarmy smart-suit smiles on the stage and repeats "I think we should call the NHS a Wellness Service" - then I apologise to your ear drums in advance.

To read a more about Health Prevention vs. Promotion visit PUBLIC MATTERS.

By 999 Call for the NHS, Aug 28 2017 02:28PM

Simon Maginn ponders the pros and cons of writing to your MP.

I’ve always been the kind of person who writes to public figures. I used to have a special pot of green ink and a venomous quill specially for these letters, though of course now it’s emails instead and the green ink is mostly used for dying the cat.*

Is there any point writing to an MP? Is it worth it? Don’t MPs just do whatever they like, and do they pay any attention to these letters? These are questions that rarely trouble me greatly, I have to confess.

I write to my MP because I’ve got a head full of steam about whatever it is and I need a way of discharging it that saves the cat from any further cruelty. So a letter to an MP can be a form of therapy, a way of releasing tension. That alone would be reason enough to do it. But there’s more.

MPs vary hugely, of course, as to how they respond to constituents’ letters.

Some will simply append a death threat and then run weeping to the press about the wickedness of the world (yes, I’m looking at you, Lucy Allan, Con, Telford, majority 720).

Others will take a more dignified approach and wittily tell the writer to “f**k off back to Scotland” (take a bow, James Heappey, Conservative, Wells, majority 7,582). But in my experience, an MP will always try to answer a polite and sensible email with a polite and sensible reply.

It may not be the reply you want, but it will be a reply. You will have made contact with your representative on a subject which is important to you, and they will have read it and been forced to consider it, if only for the length of time required to decide which of their five stock answers it deserves. Even though you may not get that reply that reveals the big secret - knowing that your words have injected a drop of guilty conscience or interrupted the lobbyist's narrative that is forming an MPs opinion makes it worthwhile (Dont forget corporate lobbyists are inside Parliament and our letters are there to combat their poison).

And on rare, joyous occasions, you may even get a reply which answers your question.

Those are gala days, to be celebrated with fireworks and hot air balloons and displays of athletic prowess. Most letters will fail to achieve anything concrete. MPs are in receipt of a staggering quantity of mail, and much of it will be some winning combination of the incoherent, the abusive, the repetitious, the vexatious, and the just plain mental.

But if you can craft a letter which is none of these things, which raises a concern which you feel deeply about and have taken some trouble to research, which is polite and businesslike in tone, which asks for something which can be delivered and doesn’t demand impossible instant solutions to complex and intractable problems, and which is succinct and - ideally - written in comprehensible English, you are immediately ahead of the pack.

Your letter will shine in comparison to the garrulous maundering that are its fellows, and will demand - demand! - a considered reply. This is the very essence of democracy, the essential bargain: MPs are representatives, neither gods nor servants, but people who owe you an obligation to at least pretend to care about whatever it is you care about. So write to them. Be polite, be clear, be reasonable, be accurate, and be brief.

And have the hot air balloon and the fireworks on stand-by. Because you never know…

*The ink/cat is obviously intended as a sort of joke, but do please feel free to inundate me with emails complaining about the senseless cruelty of my ink/cat related activities. All such communications will of course be ignored, unless they’re particularly indignant, in which case they will be pitilessly mocked.

999 Bloggers

We need your help!

We are all volunteers and there is no polite way to say it. We always need some money to help make 999 a effective success.


Please think about donating.

No matter how big or small the amount every penny will go towards the Campaign



We are not aligned

to any political party.


We never have been.

We know it's going to take political legislation to bring back the NHS into public hands but we remain independent of all the parties in order to lobby and pressure all the parties. We are about people and the NHS they should be able to keep.


So to all MPs and politicians -   If the policy fits, we'll support it.  




If you have an article to share, a blog item you feel we could use please do get in touch.


This space was always intended as a grassroots venue for campaigners to raise their voices.


Contact Steve for more details.

RSS Feed

Editor of The Lancet


Agrees with an NHS Staff member with their cry for the resignation of the NHS England Board. He calls their preparations for the pandemic as SHAMBOLIC and a

"National Disgrace"


What do you think? Find out more and get involved.