DONATE facebook-icon-copy twitterICON

999 Call for the NHS

A grassroots NHS campaign. Not affiliated to any of the political parties.

999logofinal_Pill_straight_360 999 Blog

By 999 Call for the NHS, Jun 22 2017 08:00PM

999 Call for the NHS is on a mission to expose the myths about “balanced budgets” that all three main parties have signed up to. These myths, that we are all guilty of swallowing at some point in the last twenty years, stem from basic misapprehensions about the creation and injection of money into the econpmy and stand in the way of politicians committing themselvs and their party to properly funding the NHS, social care and all other public services.

There is clearly a double standard when it comes to government spending: it’s apparently fine to spend pots of public money on corporate welfare - but not on public services.

While public services are taking the hit -which is exactly the purpose of this thin we call “austerity” - massive corporate welfare payments amount to around £85bn/year, according to an audit carried out by Kevin Farnsworth, social policy lecturer at York University. LINK HERE

Our NHS, like other services, is being run down and sold for want of adequate funding - but currently the UK government gives - GIVES!!! - £6bn/year subsidies to fossil fuel industries operating in the UK


and a further £3.7bn subsidies to fossil fuel production overseas FOSSIL FUEL SUBS ABROAD in countries including Russia, Saudi Arabia and China. Um... pardon? You heard right...

New tax breaks for North Sea oil and gas production announced by the ex-chancellor, George Osborne, in 2015 will cost us taxpayers a further £1.7bn by 2020, according to government figures. DOWNLOAD

Before the G20 summit in 2014, Kevin Watkins, director of the British think tank the Overseas Development Institute, said:

“The evidence points to a publicly financed bail-out for carbon-intensive companies, and support for uneconomic investments that could drive the planet far beyond the internationally agreed target of limiting global temperature increases to no more than 2C.

“This is real money which could be put into schools or hospitals. It is simply not economic to invest like this. This is the insanity of the situation. They are diverting investment from economic low-carbon alternatives such as solar, wind and hydro-power and they are undermining the prospects for an ambitious UN climate deal in 2015.”

Nothing seems to have changed.

The World Health Organisation estimates that between 2030 and 2050, climate change is expected to cause approximately 250 000 additional deaths per year, from malnutrition, malaria, diarrhoea and heat stress. WHO LINK It makes for terrifying reading and is a clear case for a country like ours preparing for the long term future and making ready a health service that can help not only our society but those who are allies and on whom we depend for goods and services.

while the state is giving private companies an increasing amount in direct handouts, the money repaid in corporate taxation is falling almost year upon year. GUARDIAN £93 billion ARTICLE

This is a practice that needs to stop. To do this all politicians need to get their heads clear on how the economy works. How Austerity measures are simply stagnating and strangling our society.

It seems we the people who must help them.

So whilst the case is made over and over that " we cannot afford a health service" and that it is up to us as individuals to pay for it - silently and sneakily the perpetrators of Austerity, the big fatcat corporations are being handed valuable amounts of public money to do what? It will not return to the public purse. It will sit in a corporate bank account doing what? Buidling the economy?

And this is where we return to the fundamental issue. The economy is not HOW MUCH MONEY there is - large amounts of the stuff siiting idle in the pockets of the rich. (We're always told we're the 6th largest Economy yet we cant afford an NHS?) The Economy is about how much MONEY IS MOVING in the circular wave-like pattern that indicates a healthy growing economy.

A government invests by spending on public services and infrastrucure, citizens pay it back through buying goods, houses, holidays, taxes. A government invests first. It does not raise taxes in order to spend. That is what Austerity has convinced us.

And it's wrong.

By 999 Call for the NHS, Jun 20 2017 05:00PM

None of the three main parties’ 2017 Manifestos commits to funding the NHS adequately. This is because they are all still hung up on the “tax and spend” myths that the well-respected Cambridge economist Ha-Joon Chang recently called on voters to reject. Ha-Joon Article

These myths create the delusion that there is an inherent virtue in balancing the nation’s books. If you stop and think about it for a minute, this is clearly not the case.

If government cuts public spending, on the misapprehension that this will reduce the deficit, it shrinks the economy: the effect is to stop putting money in the pockets of public employees, who stop spending it in the private sector and to stop filling the order books of the public sector.

These are the facts that we need to get our heads around, in order to get rid of “tax and spend” myths:

There is no inherent virtue in balancing the nation’s books - it depends on the circumstances.

As Ha-Joon Chang explains,

“ in an overheating economy, deficit spending would be a serious folly. However, in today’s UK economy, some deficit spending may be good – necessary, even.”

This is because the economy is stagnating, although this stagnation has been masked by “an oceanic scale” of personal debt, funded by banks that have excess cash to splash around.

This economic stagnation is the entirely predictable consequence of successive governments’ “austerity” policy - since, as we have seen, cutting public spending shrinks the economy.

Austerity is about dismantling the welfare state; the 2008 financial sector collapse was the shock that enabled successive UK governments to impose it - justifying it by phony “tax and spend” myths.

The ConDem and Conservative governments have inflicted the huge costs of this bailout on the British public. The poorest citizens, in the poorest regions, are being hit hardest.

The British government spent at least £1trillion bailing out the corporate banksters whose unregulated greed caused the 2008 financial crash. This rescue package was equivalent to around 3/4 of the size of the entire GDP of the UK economy.

Gordon Brown’s Labour government then brought in McKinsey to tell it how to cut NHS spending.

None of the three main parties’ 2017 Manifestos commits to funding the NHS adequately. This is because they are all still hung up on the “tax and spend” myths that the well-respected Cambridge economist Ha-Joon Chang recently called on voters to reject in his very clear and simple GUARDIAN ARTICLE

McKinsey duly set out the cuts proposals that have led to NHS England’s 5 Year Forward View and the Sustainability and Transformation Plans. The advice formed the QIPP report, commissioned by Labour, used by the Coalition, QIPP is the basis of the ‘Nicholson Challenge’ which forced £20bn ‘efficiency savings’ on the NHS between 2010 – 2015. The advice has been described as ‘entirely without evidence’ by senior health policy analysts. (NHA LINK BELOW)

Small wonder then that the 2017 Labour Manifesto - written by Jon Ashworth, formerly a special adviser to Gordon Brown when he was Chancellor - continues the austerity mythology.

The UK welfare state isn’t especially large

As of 2016, the British welfare state (measured by public social spending) was, at 21.5% of GDP, barely three-quarters of welfare spending in other comparably rich European countries.

Welfare spending is not consumption

It is not a drain on the nation’s productive resources that has to be minimised. Far from being consumption, a lot of welfare spending is investment that pays back more than it costs, through increased productivity in the future.

Expenditure on education (especially early learning programmes such as Sure Start), childcare and school meals programmes is an investment in the nation’s future productivity. So is investment in the NHS - an unhealthy population is not going to be a productive worksforce. Unemployment benefit, especially if combined with good publicly funded retraining and job-search programmes, such as in Scandinavia, helps people to hang onto their health, self-respect and skills that would otherwise be lost.

Tax is not a burden

In return for paying taxes, we get an array of public services, from education, health and old-age care, through to flood defence and roads to the police and military.

However, all mainstream parties promulgate the false idea that tax is a burden. Ha-Joon Chang points out that this is as daft as claiming that paying for a curry or a beer is a burden. In each case, we get something in return, that is worth the price paid. The proof of the pudding is in the eating - if tax really were a burden, as Ha-Joon Chang says,

“all rich individuals and companies would move to Paraguay or Bulgaria, where the top rate of income tax is 10%. Of course, this does not happen because, in those countries, in return for low tax you get poor public services...

Japanese and German companies don’t move out of their countries in droves despite some of the highest corporate income tax rates in the world (31% and 30% respectively) because they get good infrastructure, well-educated workers, strong public support for research and development, and well-functioning administrative and legal systems.”

New Labour was complicit in the austerity lie. But Labour is now an officially anti-austerity party with a leadership that was elected on the basis that austerity is a political choice. So now is the time that the Labour Party needs to reflect that in its entire policy approach - including its NHS and social care funding commitments.


We Wont Stand for More Austerity - our first post on this theme

NHA Article on McKinsey

McKinsey Consultants in Everything!

999 Bloggers

We need your help!

We are all volunteers and there is no polite way to say it. We always need some money to help make 999 a effective success.


Please think about donating.

No matter how big or small the amount every penny will go towards the Campaign



We are not aligned

to any political party.


We never have been.

We know it's going to take political legislation to bring back the NHS into public hands but we remain independent of all the parties in order to lobby and pressure all the parties. We are about people and the NHS they should be able to keep.


So to all MPs and politicians -   If the policy fits, we'll support it.  




If you have an article to share, a blog item you feel we could use please do get in touch.


This space was always intended as a grassroots venue for campaigners to raise their voices.


Contact Steve for more details.

RSS Feed

Editor of The Lancet


Agrees with an NHS Staff member with their cry for the resignation of the NHS England Board. He calls their preparations for the pandemic as SHAMBOLIC and a

"National Disgrace"


What do you think? Find out more and get involved.