DONATE facebook-icon-copy twitterICON

999 Call for the NHS

A grassroots NHS campaign. Not affiliated to any of the political parties.

999logofinal_Pill_straight_360 999 Blog

By 999 Call for the NHS, Jun 19 2017 03:25PM

999 Call for the NHS exists to stop and reverse NHS cuts and sell offs, and to restore the NHS as a publicly owned, funded, run and provided health service that is free at the point of need and provides the full range of care and treatments to everyone, based on their clinical need.


We also campaign for social care to be fully publicly funded and provided and available to all who need it in order to live independent decent lives - not just as “a means-tested privatised, residual service for those with substantial needs”.


This requires adequate funding. But none of the three main parties’ 2017 Manifestos commits to this.


Given their “austerity” record over the last two Parliaments, it’s not surprising that the Conservative and LibDem manifestos offer little in the way of increased NHS and social care funding.


However, it’s disappointing that Labour - on closer inspection - have also failed to commit to enough NHS and social care funding to pull the services out of crisis.


In his critique of the Labour NHS manifesto, Shropshire Defend Our NHS campaigner Pete Gillard said

that its failure to commit to adequate NHS funding levels was down to John McDonnell’s insistence on a balanced budget: READ FULL STATEMENT



On social media, Labour’s failure to commit to adequate NHS funding has been defended on the grounds that, had Labour committed to adequate NHS funding, the resulting media attacks on Labour as the party of tax and spend would have totally wrecked the party’s chances of winning the election.


Well, Labour didn’t win the election despite playing safe with its insistence on a balanced budget; and is it really credible that the late surge in support for Labour, which led to a hung parliament, would have been forestalled by a commitment to proper NHS funding?


Surely such a commitment would have found favour among these voters and could have pulled in even more, given the wide public support for the NHS and its importance as an election issue?


Bernie Sanders points out – the specifics of NHS policy notwithstanding - that Labour massively strengthened its position precisely by campaigning against the Establishment and not kow-towing.


The (positive) argument needs to be: Don’t hold back!!! Don’t be timid and sacrifice your own chances.


Of course, unless the NHS Reinstatement Bill is passed - which would stop and reverse NHS privatisation - more funding would mean more money going to profiteering companies. The need to pass the NHS Reinstatement Bill goes without saying. Too bad it’s not in the Labour manifesto, which merely commits to making the NHS the preferred provider and stopping excess profits being taken out of the NHS.


Funding the NHS and social care properly is economically beneficial - as well as morally right.


As NHA Party member Naveen Judah stated at the first Save Our A&Es public meeting in Halifax in March 2014, NHS spending has a “multiplier effect” – so that for every £1 of NHS funding, more recirculates in the economy.


When the government pays for public services it puts money in the pockets of public employees, who spend it in shops, on rent, on holidays – in short, in the private sector. It also fills the order books of the private sector – with railway lines, and lightbulbs, books for schools, hospital equipment….


The Body Economic: Why Austerity Kills – A Study by Dr David Stuckler and Dr Sanjay Basu – found that the multiplier effect for health spending is greater than 3 – so each £1 generates at least a £3 return.

LINK TO STUDY


When governments spend they boost the economy – and ensure the provision of affordable essential services for all. Government spending boosts the healthy circular motion of the economy. Money goes out into the public domain and comes back in via public spending and taxes.



Before the June 8th election, the well-respected Cambridge economist Ha-Joon Chang called on voters to reject “tax and spend” myths about the economy that the mainstream political parties are still hung up on:


999 Call for the NHS extend this call to all NHS campaigners.


For some facts we all need to get our heads around, please check out this post. It will be worth it.


HA-JOON CHANG ARTICLE






999 Bloggers

We need your help!

We are all volunteers and there is no polite way to say it. We always need some money to help make 999 a effective success.

 

Please think about donating.

No matter how big or small the amount every penny will go towards the Campaign

FIND OUT MORE

REMEMBER

We are not aligned

to any political party.

 

We never have been.

We know it's going to take political legislation to bring back the NHS into public hands but we remain independent of all the parties in order to lobby and pressure all the parties. We are about people and the NHS they should be able to keep.

 

So to all MPs and politicians -   If the policy fits, we'll support it.  

CONTACT US

ADD YOUR VOICE

 

If you have an article to share, a blog item you feel we could use please do get in touch.

 

This space was always intended as a grassroots venue for campaigners to raise their voices.

 

Contact Steve for more details.

RSS Feed