DONATE facebook-icon-copy twitterICON

999 Call for the NHS

A grassroots NHS campaign. Not affiliated to any of the political parties.

999logofinal_Pill_straight_360 999 Blog

By 999 Call for the NHS, Mar 28 2020 04:33AM

The new COVID19 Discharge Service Requirements issued last week to Foundation Trusts and other NHS England Management had one very clear message - “forget the usual Discharge Process - get the beds empty within the week by Friday 27th March”.


15,000 beds to be exact. Hospital beds cleared ready for the aniticipated rush of Coronavirus cases. A mantra found throughout the guidelines is “ The default assumption will be discharge home today”.


This week the Health Service Journal announced that a senior health policy spokesperson told them the guidance “basically amounted to orders which say: whatever it costs, get people out of hospital.


"Don’t worry about the rules, just do it.”


We asked a recently retired Senior Nurse “Could the beds be cleared in a week?”


Their reply: “Possibly, ward nurses are used to this sort of pressure and there will be a relentless push from the top down. I don’t see this as being very different in practice for ward staff - the discharge co-ordinator will bear the brunt because they will have to really push for discharges, but ward staff are used to that.”


So where are these patients to be transferred to?


Well 1% for whom there has been a life-changing event( car crash etc) and HOME is not an option they will be found a bed in a nursing home or residential care home. But there is a problem there lurking... more of that later.




According to the Discharge Assessment guidelines Pathways 0,1, 2 those heading for home will be met by vast teams of smiling, able and willing nurses and carers, supported by coordinators and managers.


In the Hospital there will be :

Dedicated staff to support and manage

Social care colleagues

Case managers responsible for ensuring individuals and families are fully informed of the next steps, arranging transport and ‘settle in’ support

Senior clinical staff to support with positive risk-taking


Out in the community there will be:

A single coordinator which is the community provider

A case manager allocated by the single provider

Assessment of longer term care packages

Social care and community staff

Multispecialty Community Teams

Voluntary organisations and their volunteers


It’s a miracle really. Out of nowhere there are suddenly a wealth of bodies to take up the challenge - like pulling rabbits out of Top Hats.




So wondrous is it that you even get a leaflet to help you cope with one thing.


“Due to these pressures, once you no longer need care in hospital, as decided by the health team looking after you, will be discharged. You will not have a choice over your discharge, but it is always our priority to discharge people to a safe and appropriate place”.



“Is your HOME truly a safe and appropriate place?”


Well 99% of those being pushed out this week are about to find out. Anyone who has tried to care for a terminally ill or seriously sick patient in a living room without proper equipment, space or adequate training will tell you that lifting, turning, feeding and toileting and medicating in the home is a painful and almost impossible task.


For the 1% - those pesky difficult patients who can’t go home and require bed treatment to continue on Pathway 3, the NHS will cover costs and pay nursing/care homes to take the patients. The sticking point has proven to be that patients are not being routinely tested on leaving hospital. Ethically speaking how can a care home/facility - inhabited by elderly and vulnerable residents - take a possibly infected patient into their home?


The same troubled scanerio is playing out in California It’s a real risk and tensions have already emerged as care and nursing homes have refused to accept discharges unless the patient has been tested for the virus. Testing is not a requirement under the new Discharge Service Requirements. WHY?


The former Senior Nurse continued: “Nursing homes will be forced to take people on the basis of this new process, they will have a stick to make it happen somewhere in those guidelines, community nurses will absorb the volunteer force to get people home and set up... definitely not something I approve of”.


Money may also be a concern for GPs and their community teams - already in short supply with new recent contracting cutting their funding - but a bigger concern right now is whether they are supported by functional and required standard Personal Protective Equipment.


Some NHS Staff have resorted to SCREWFIX and paying for their own masks - which is a disgrace. And GPs say they and their staff are being placed in danger with no quality equipment in their possession and little sign (despite ‘sincere’ announcements from Health Secretary Matt Hancock) of new supplies coming anytime soon.




Ironically one Nurse Practitioner in a Community Surgery setting was struggling with this week’s activities on a very different front - going digital has meant surgery doors are shut and there are no face to face appointments. She is only too aware that there are patients in her community suffering because of this - including cancer patients who are now facing cancelled operations due to hospitals being instructed to focus only on COVID19


“I’m feeling guilty because I’m not actually doing anything. Lots of online planning meetings but in terms of helping patients - nothing. Safety nets and ordinary practice standards are at an all time low and that is a big risk. The strain on the system as a whole and our already strained response times and access issues are at crisis in terms of patient safety. And of course next week we are being asked to run ‘hot and cold’ surgeries - hot meaning face to face appointments with little or no safety equipment”.


So hospital staff struggling with stressful 80hr weeks don’t feel supported.

GPs and their staff don’t feel supported.

What about the new Army of 405,000 volunteers who are now stepping into the warzone? Will they feel supported? 405,000 is a big number - and just what NHS England have been pushing for in their Long Term Plan.. more volunteers!


The Nurse Practitioner is not impressed. “It’s another huge worry. Who's going to vet them? Who’s going to train them? Who's going to manage the potential draw of "unsuitables”? For sure, many genuine folk will want to help but potentially it’s a magnet for trouble.”


She is not alone in being concerned about the New Model Army of Volunteers. This Community Pharmacist is in a state of shock after an NHS England online webinar on the new measures. Volunteers bring with them enthusiasm, eagerness and an ability to not understand protocols... and he is genuinely worried they could (through lack of understanding) harm people and themselves.



So the year 2020... Enter Covid19


This article is not intended as a moan about the faults of how this pandemic is being dealt with by the establishment - the misinformation, the ambiguous statements about what to do, what the medical facts are etc. Dealing with this pandemic is surely consuming huge amounts of energy, stamina, nerve and a lot of failure, especially when we are at the mercy of politicians whose ‘dead behind the eyes’ behaviour is the result of never having dreamt their comfortable power could be threatened by a spiky little virus.


A new, spiky little “clever virus” that has raised the issue of the need for properly funded preparedness and a distinct need for hospital space, acute beds with strong robust teams of staff. So much so that, following Italy and Spain, we too are now setting up a ‘field hospital’ - in the shell of ExCel Exhibition Centre with 4000 beds. Since this article began it now appears Birmingham, Manchester are also to get their own field hospitals. What about the rural areas? Shame all those community and cottage hospitals that dotted the land have been got rid of - sold at a low price to developers of bijou apartments for the wealthy.


This must be at the back of Simon Stevens’ mind too. Last year, June 2019 NHS England CEO, Simon Stevens, had a wobble and claimed, ironically, that bed cuts “had gone too far” in a presentation to NHS Confederation “the membership body that brings together and speaks on behalf of the whole NHS”.


Stevens was having an ironic wobble because he knew only too well about the cuts. He’s helped lead and design them since his appointment in 2014. His 5 Year Forward View and recently a ten year NHS Long Term Plan have created an axe-wielding wolf dressed up in a little pink frock chopping beds and hospitals in every direction called “Moving Healthcare Closer to Home” .


He probably learnt all about “Care Closer to Home” during his 9 year residency with (wait for it)... United Healthcare, USA’s largest health insurance company and major global health market player. There he was CEO of UH Medicare and President of Global Strategy. Stevens is the hatchet man for a process that has been going on since the 90’s as we have drifted quietly toward the USA model. It relies on what it calls “prevention” and “integrated care” and the tools are community care, preferably in your own bed, digitech and data and a big push to find more use of volunteers (free labour) in the system. That won't mean saving money it will just mean more of the public money going into the hands of the providers controlling the system.

We have to face the fact that our NHS, a once world-leading public health system, available to all, that set global health standards in mid-20th Century is now, in 2020, a fragmented and broken system as a direct result of three decades of continual neglect by successive governments who have fallen for the corporate philosophy of the likes of McKinsey, KPMG, Price Waterhouse Coopers and Deloitte. Fallen for the lie that public services are ineffective, expensive and bureaucratic and that business and the ‘free’ commercial market know better and could drive down costs and improve quality.


Lies.


Lies that have motivated massive spending cuts, hospital closures, restrictions to the comprehensive menu of treatments, sold off public assets to developers, and reduced hospital beds by over 50% over thirty years. That’s a lot of beds that might have come in handy at this point in time.


Kathryn H Jacobsen, summed up her Global Health Report “Will COVID-19 generate global preparedness?” for the George Mason University with:


“The COVID-19 outbreak is yet another reminder of the necessity of intensified and sustained commitment to global public health preparedness. The world does not need more evidence of the health, social, economic, environmental, and other problems that arise when we fail to invest adequately in global health security. What is required to break this panic-then-forget cycle is to follow through on prioritising, funding, and implementing preparedness interventions.”

Here in the UK we must not panic then forget. We must remember that the NHS that bloomed in 1948 onwards offered everyone protection and support in such times as this. The NHS before outsourcing, contracting and corporate profiteering, with a coordinated and connected relationship to a Public Health Department and Social Care Department, would be dealing with this pandemic in a very different and more effective manner.


And looking to the future we need a service like that again. We don’t need a health industry or market run by businessmen obssessed with growth and shareholder profit.


We need a health service that knows and respects the human “Art of Caring”.


The world needs that again.


COMING UP NEXT - CRAZY THINKING?


In one week of lockdown this pandemic has enabled this corporate slave government to push through exactly what it has been pushing for the last eight years since the 2012 Health & Social Care Act - Non-hospital Care, Digitech and Charity volunteers.


You might think we’re crazy but the question we have to ask ourselves is:


“Are NHS England using this pandemic to justify their Long Term Plan?”



By 999 Call for the NHS, Aug 4 2019 12:27PM

A reaction to a Guardian piece today. A prime example of why we should keep our BS ALERTS handy at all times... 999 comments in bold.


Boris Johnson promises (fingers crossed) £1.8bn to boost the NHS



Boris Johnson is to inject £1.8bn into the NHS as part of his pledge to upgrade 20 hospitals across the country, it has emerged.


Which twenty hospitals? and of these which are upgrades - physical building improvements, equipment maintenance - and which are 'sell-off the rather nice old building and build a modern centralised services hospital designed to support the removal of all good localised support services in a region'?


The new prime minister has used a boost in health funding as part of an attempt to build a domestic agenda beyond Brexit, with his team well aware that they could be forced into an election this year.


That is key. More “bullshit central” to sway tory dissenters.


But experts have already warned that the fund may not be enough even to cover the upgrades Johnson has already promised. Full details of the plan are set to be revealed on Monday, but it is understood the new funds will be directed straight to the front line for new beds and updated equipment. So keep your eyes peeled for that. Standby to contact your local ccg/stp and ask them where the money has gone.


It is also set to include upgrades to wards and some building repairs. Oho so definitely one to check...and what sort of beds will they be? Fully NHS funded or reserved for self-funding/private paying patients?Interesting to note that Simon Stevens, CEO NHS England, recently said that NHS England had cut too many beds – forgetting that now that NHS Foundation Trust Hospitals are required to make income to survive they actually need beds to do just that! SIMON SAYS...


The money is set to be made available immediately, though Downing St has not revealed where it will come from. Sigh... It comes from the public money the government can quite easily create if it wants to.


Johnson has already made clear he is willing to spend more money on public services, using the so-called “fiscal headroom” created by the previous government’s spending plan.


Pardon? So now the damaging cuts of so-called austerity are being described as the the saviour mechanism that is going to let this new prime minister spend “piggy bank coffers” on the nhs? The headroom was supposed to help the economy in the event of a no-deal Brexit.


A source said: “The prime minister has been clear since day one that the NHS is a top priority. This money will be felt by frontline services , by the doctors and nurses whose hard work is invaluable, and by the patients they care for.”


It will be interesting to see where on the “frontline” it is felt and how - more low level assistants? More funds for volunteer support?More funds to promote the idea of community care? Let's be clear there is always money when a government decides it needs it...




The Vote Leave campaign controversially argued that funds sent to the EU would be used to fund the NHS instead. Dominic Cummings, the Vote Leave strategy chief now overseeing Johnson’s Downing St plans, said such a pledge should have been one of the government’s first moves after the Brexit vote. Because manipulation is all... Keep politics simple and emotional and people will be swayed.




Researchers at the Nuffield Trust thinktank have suggested that Johnson’s promise to upgrade 20 hospitals would cost at least £3.2bn, based on an assessment of hospitals two years ago.


“Based on the conservative £160m cost estimate per trust, the total cost for upgrading all NHS services would be around £33bn,” tweeted Sally Gainsbury, a senior policy analyst at the trust. “That wouldn’t all need to happen at once – it takes time to build a new hospital wing after all. There have been calls to double the NHS budget for NHS investment – including from the NHS’s own regulator NHS Improvement. That would take investment to around £14bn next year.”


What’s needed is longterm vision and a belief that the NHS is worth having - morally, socially, economically. And - stating the bleeding obvious - all very well pumping money into the system but right now it’s like pumping air into a rubber dingy with holes in it...


Even if this media piece has some truth in it, any money pumped in now will head straight to the providers and do nothing but support and promote the restructuring and reshaping moves to the two tier American style Accountable Care system we are witnessing in our local areas.


The NHS needs proper funding and it needs to be reclaimed as OUR NHS - a publicly provided, owned and delivered health service for all. #NHS4ALL




999 Bloggers

We need your help!

We are all volunteers and there is no polite way to say it. We always need some money to help make 999 a effective success.

 

Please think about donating.

No matter how big or small the amount every penny will go towards the Campaign

FIND OUT MORE

REMEMBER

We are not aligned

to any political party.

 

We never have been.

We know it's going to take political legislation to bring back the NHS into public hands but we remain independent of all the parties in order to lobby and pressure all the parties. We are about people and the NHS they should be able to keep.

 

So to all MPs and politicians -   If the policy fits, we'll support it.  

CONTACT US

ADD YOUR VOICE

 

If you have an article to share, a blog item you feel we could use please do get in touch.

 

This space was always intended as a grassroots venue for campaigners to raise their voices.

 

Contact Steve for more details.

RSS Feed
FIND OUT MORE

Editor of The Lancet

 

Agrees with an NHS Staff member with their cry for the resignation of the NHS England Board. He calls their preparations for the pandemic as SHAMBOLIC and a

"National Disgrace"

 

What do you think? Find out more and get involved.