DONATE facebook-icon-copy twitterICON

999 Call for the NHS

A grassroots NHS campaign. Not affiliated to any of the political parties.

999logofinal_Pill_straight_360 999 Blog

By Jenny Shepherd, Mar 7 2019 06:09PM


999 Call for the NHS is urging everyone to write to their MP to support NHS EDM #2013 which is an Early Day Motion called a “Prayer” Motion. It’s the only type of motion that can annul and stop secondary legislation.


This is urgent because the Department of Health has “quietly” introduced secondary legislation, in the form of a Statutory Instrument, to make major changes to NHS regulations that will damage the way in which GP/Primary Care and Commissioning works - and of course it will not benefit patients or staff.


We are asking MPs to use parliamentary procedure to call this legislation into question and annul the Statutory Instrument


Please visit our Prayer Motion page to find a LETTER TO MY MP template and more information. This is urgent we have until March 24th to get this annulled. It can be done.



Secondary legislation? What the Duck is all that about then?


In the light of raised eyebrows and lots of questions since we launched the Prayer Motion campaign - this blog post explains what secondary legislation is, when it was created and how it has been used and abused since it was introduced in the Statutory Instruments Act 1946.


The Parliament UK website says that:


Secondary legislation is law created by ministers (or other bodies) under powers given to them by an Act of Parliament - the Statutory Instruments Act 1946. It  is used to fill in the details of Acts (primary legislation). These details provide practical measures that enable the  law to be enforced and operate in daily life. 


Most secondary legislation is created, 'made and laid' as a Statutory Instrument.


Statutory Instruments (SI) were intended as a device to allow Ministers to make minor updates and amend existing Bills without bothering the House of Commons (or indeed any part of parliament) - allowing ministers to deal with localised and/or minor issues and changes to law without time-wasting debates in the Commons.


That’s the theory. The practice seems to be a bit different.





THE BIG CONCERN


The theory sounds like common sense, sort of... Until you notice the sharp upward trend in the use of Statutory Instruments through the Thatcher Years, into New Labour and the last ten years of this thing we call ‘Austerity’ government.


The red lines in the table below show a huge disparity between the number of actual ACTS (Primary Legislation passed in the Commons & Lords) and the number of Statutory Instruments.






By and large, because of the way they are made (the Negative Procedure), Statutory Instruments are only seen by ministerial committees. This means there is NO opposition oversight of or input into these legislative changes. In the case of this Statutory Instrument - it is not even required to have even nominal scrutiny by the cross-party-house Joint Committee of Statutory Instruments (Select Committee).


What’s the point of having Parliamentary opposition if it can’t oppose? To use the Mainstream Media’s classic line “where's the balance?” One party state, anyone?



Latest figures on the number of SI’s passing through unseen? The House of Commons Background Paper on Statutory Instruments (2016) says:


In the region of 3,500 SIs are made each year. Many SIs are not subject to any parliamentary procedure, and simply become law on the date stated. Whether they are subject to parliamentary procedure, and if so which one, is determined by the parent Act.


On top of this,look at the size of these Statutory Instruments. Given the number of pages, can they really contain only minor amendments and non-vital pieces of policy making?





According to Bracknell: “Statutory Instruments vary enormously in their scope from substantial pieces of legislation to considerable numbers of orders temporarily restricting traffic on particular local roads.”

The full easy-to-read Bracknell report is here: https://vdocuments.site/acts-and-statutory-instruments.html


So we have to ask - are Statutory Instruments now a way of changing Acts and regulations without Parliamentary debate and proper scrutiny?


If so much paperwork filled with items, appendices and addendums is passing through the corridors of parliament unseen by most MPs and Lords, is it any wonder that we are crying out “Democracy? What Democracy?”


This concern applies with a vengeance to Statutory Instrument 2019 No.248 The Amendments Relating to the Provision of Integrated Care Regulations 2019. It contains pages and pages of guff.


You can see for yourself - and pay special attention to PART 9 & 10.



It's a good job there is an Explanatory Memorandum to SI 2019#248 - be warned it’s uncomfortable reading but at least it’s in an English most MPs and members of the public can understand - if they were given the chance to read it of course.






If you haven't already please help make this happen. Don't be confused by Parliamentary Procedure.


Write to your MP from our Prayer Motion Page


Many thanks.












By Jenny Shepherd, Apr 15 2016 01:01PM


Either they're stupid or duplicit. Or both.
Either they're stupid or duplicit. Or both.

A lovely lovely thing happened this morning. On social media in a rambling post about local councillors & Clinical Commissioning Groups making an absolute cock-up of proceedings around public consultations and providing information - well let's be honest HIDING information, producing classic i-Arse facts and goobledegook, and plain lies!


But out of that feeling of despair when you just can't figure out how to fight these awful monstrous individuals who seem hell-bent on killing Our NHS - they really do - comes something delightful from a campaigner somewhere in the ether. The question came up "are they really thick or are they in on the whole thing?" And then the new lovely word we should all get put into the English Dictionary


STUPLICITY


Are those in positions of decision making and power genuinely stupid or are they aware of the catastrophic damage being done to the NHS, and the country, and just dont give a shit?


Duplicitous. Knowing. Stuplicity.


It's a question campaigners are constantly having to ask themselves as they sit in dull, "pins in my eyes would be more beneficial" CCG meetings, Scrutiny Committees, Health & Wellbeing Boards, Healthwatch, NHS England consultations... As they engage with politicians, Union Officials, local dignatories, local media...



Right now local CCG's, NHS Trusts, Foundation Trusts, GPs, local authorities are all being squeezed into something called the Sustainability & Transformation Plan which is a sealant strategy designed to make the Five Year Forward View concrete - think concrete boots.


By June 16th, NHS Trusts, coerced into working with local authoriites and 3rd Sector organisations have to come up with a plan to show how they are are going to dramatically improve services whilst cutting cutting cutting.... SLASHING. So look forward to lots of iApps, digital innovation and secretive meetings where the public can't reach.


The NHS is about to be divided up into 44 Footprints. Where that lovely term has come from no one knows but no doubt some oik in a suit with a good grasp of Excel came up with that gem. And got paid millions no doubt because that is what we come to expect from the likes of Ernst & Young, McKinsey, Price Waterhouse Coopers. Trouble is describing these "footprints" is damn near impossible. Currently campaigners are struggling to grasp the sense behind it because it is clouded in layer upon layer of jargon, confusing terminology, and official document (pass the pins please) formatting. And we're getting there.


A terrfyingly dull NHS England version is here STP ONE


An excellent link written by campaigners who have worked really hard to understand it is this one. STP TWO


Using the new word STUPLICITY we'd like to invite you to pick up the phone, write a quick email and ask your

local councillors

local MPs

local Clinical Commissioning Group

local Scrutiny Committee

local Health & Wellbeing Board

local Healthwatch

local NHS Trust

community leaders

and charity organisations like Macmillan, Age UK, MIND.


Then ask the Sustainability and Transformation Plan leaders... STUPLICITY GROUP LEADERS


You keep talking about increasing services and improving quality. But everything points to cutting services and reducing quality in staff and resources.


Are you really stupid? Or are you in on it? The destruction of our NHS.





Read why people are supporting 999

999 Bloggers

We need your help!

We are all volunteers and there is no polite way to say it. We always need some money to help make 999 a effective success.

 

Please think about donating.

No matter how big or small the amount every penny will go towards the Campaign

FIND OUT MORE RSS Feed

REMEMBER

We are not aligned

to any political party.

 

We never have been.

We know it's going to take political legislation to bring back the NHS into public hands but we remain independent of all the parties in order to lobby and pressure all the parties. We are about people and the NHS they should be able to keep.

 

So to all MPs and politicians -   If the policy fits, we'll support it.  

ADD YOUR VOICE

CONTACT US

If you have an article to share, a blog item you feel we could use please do get in touch.

 

This space was always intended as a grassroots venue for campaigners to raise their voices.

 

Contact Our Steve for more details.