HOMEPAGE BUTTON 999 BLOG DONATE flickr_256 facebook-icon-copy twitterICON Join a Campaign Group

The Court of Appeal has issued an order granting us permission to appeal the ruling against our Judicial Review of the proposed payment mechanism in NHS England’s Accountable Care Organisation contract.

 

The ACO Contract ( now rebranded by NHS England as the Integrated Care Provider contract) proposes that healthcare providers are not paid per treatment, but by a ‘Whole Population Annual Payment’, which is a set amount for the provision of named services during a defined period. This, it is argued, unlawfully shifts the risk of there being an underestimate of patient numbers from the commissioner to the provider, and endangers service standards.

 

In April,  the High Court ruled against the our legal challenge (see links below) to NHS England’s Accountable Care Organisation contract  - but all of us together with our solicitors at Leigh Day and barristers at Landmark Chambers found the ruling so flawed that we immediately applied for permission to appeal.

 

Although fully aware of this, on Friday 3rd August -  the day Parliament and the Courts went on holiday - NHS England started a public consultation on the Accountable Care Organisation contract - now renamed the Integrated Provider Organisation contract.

SO WHAT IS OUR APPEAL ALL ABOUT?

Our Judicial Review - Oct. 2018

What about the

NHS England

ACO Contract Consultation... ?

That Consultation

The consultation document asserts that the payment mechanism in the ACO/ICP contract is lawful, because NHS England arrogantly states:

 

“The High Court has now decided the two judicial reviews in NHS England’s favour.”

 

It beggars belief that NHS England is consulting on a contract that may not even be lawful. And a lot of public funds are being spent on developing the ACO model - including on the public consultation. We are very pleased that 3 judges from the Court of Appeal will have time to consider the issues properly.

 

All along we have been warning about the shrinkage of the NHS into a service that betrays the core principle of #NHS4All - a health service that provides the full range of appropriate health care to everyone with a clinical need for it, free at the point of use.

 

Since we first started work two years ago on bringing this judicial review, there have been more and more examples of restrictions and denials of NHS care, and the consequent growth of a two tier system - private for those who can afford it, and an increasingly limited NHS for the rest of us.

 

NHS England’s rebranded Accountable Care Organisation contract consultation is a specious attempt to meet the requirement to consult on a significant change to NHS and social care services.

 

We don't support the marketisation of the NHS that created the purchaser/provider split and requires contracts for the purchase and provision of services.

 

Integration of NHS and social care services, in order to provide a more straightforward process for patients with multiple ailments, is not aided by a system that essentially continues NHS fragmentation.

 

This new proposed contract is a complex lead provider contract that creates confusion over the respective roles of commissioner and provider. It requires multiple subcontracts that are likely to need constant wasteful renegotiation and change over the duration of the lead provider contract. This is just another form of fragmentation, waste and dysfunctionality.

 

The way to integrate the NHS and social care is through legislation to altogether abolish the purchaser/provider split and contracting, put social care on the same footing as the NHS as a fully publicly funded and provided service that is free at the point of use, and remove the market and non-NHS bodies from the NHS.

 

We are determined in renewing the fight to stop and reverse Accountable Care. Whether rebranded as Integrated Care or not, they see evidence that it is the same attempt to shoehorn the NHS into a limited role in a two tier healthcare system that feeds the interests of profiteering private companies.

 

We will not see our NHS reduced to  limited state-funded health care for people who can’t afford private health insurance.

 

It is vital that we defend the core NHS principle of providing the full range of appropriate treatments to everyone with a clinical need for them.

 

Such legislation already exists in the shape of  the NHS Reinstatement Bill.

 

We shall shortly issue our stage 5 Crowd Justice appeal for £18k to cover the costs of the Appeal.

 

We are so grateful to all the campaigners and members of the public who have made it possible for us to challenge the lawfulness of NHS England’s attempt to shoehorn the NHS into an imitation of the USA’s Medicare/Medicaid system.

READ MORE ABOUT THE JUDICIAL REVIEW MARCH TO THE COURTS

JR HISTORY

We began this journey back in 2016.

 

Find out more by visiting our CrowdJustice pages

How can NHS England carry out a consultation on something that once again may be considered to be

UNLAWFUL?

APRIL 24th 2018

LEEDS HIGH COURT

LEEDS APRIL JR

Our day in court and the brilliant rally created by campaigners from around the country.

SCRUTINY FAILING US SCRUTINY NELLIE

We're working with local campaign groups up and down the country to highlight the failings in the local council SCRUTINY process which is supposed to be our protection against dangerous cuts and changes.

 

We're calling on MPs to do something.

You can help us fight changes to the NHS that we think are unlawful.

 

Visit our CrowdJustice Appeal - CLICK HERE

CrowdJustice-Logo-777x440 X8 YOU DID IT